I think the parole board is acting irresponsibly and outrageously. The doctor in the prison keeps telling us, 'What can I do to get him out? He shouldn't be in here.
I give no more paroles to British officers.
She has served her time for now. She does not owe the state any more time. She will not be on parole or anything.
She has served her time and will not be on parole or any other type of supervision by our agency.
I think both the 5th Circuit and the parole board have been misled by something state keeps saying, proving that if you say something over and over again, even if it's not true, people will believe it.
If there is any lingering doubt, life without parole is the punishment.
He did have a felony warrant for parole violation. One of the original charges was auto theft. We also recovered a large bottle of alcohol, and we will be pursuing an investigation into whether or not he was drinking as well.
That may be the politically safest way to run a parole board, but the problem is that it is a manifest perversion of what the legal structure is set up to do.
Our family's position now is any time he comes up for parole we will be at every parole board meeting to make sure he stays in prison where he belongs.
We thought that life imprisonment without the possibility of parole was enough. We didn't want to be the judge about somebody else's life. We wanted God to be the judge.