I don't think it's any secret that DOE has not been objective in their investigation of Yucca Mountain. The science itself has always been questioned.
It's certainly needed. And it's something we've been asking for for a long time.
We want to see this document because we believe it will show that the repository is unsafe after 10,000 years, if not before.
They're saying everything's OK -- but they're redoing the tests! ... They are just in utter chaos.
I certainly believe (Klein) is completely and totally biased about Yucca Mountain.
In general, it reflected a lot of the recommendations the state has had for a number of years.
It's critical to know whether the law's been broken at Yucca Mountain.