Those are good proposals that we've heard from a lot of the candidates. It's not groundbreaking.
The vast majority of judges are extraordinarily honorable people, but when you've got big dollars flying around and a lot of special interests circling like hornets over judicial elections, it creates an impression that ultimately is damaging to the judiciary.
I think that's the craziest thing I've ever heard.
If he was delivering for all his clients, I would be a lot more worried. Nobody wins all the time, and if you do win all the time you're doing something bad.
It's kind of like a low-grade fever. It's not like people are running around saying, 'Oh, my goodness, the former governor is on trial.' We all know that. We've been living with this scandal for seven years now.
To us it's critically important that we send a message that the disclosure law cannot be evaded. Twenty five thousand dollars is still a significant fine for the state board of elections.
You don't need to be a rocket scientist to say this looks fishy.
We want to move from a culture of corruption to reform. It's time to get serious and give the public the government they deserve.
It seems absolutely ridiculous to me that a campaign has trouble identifying who their big givers are. Ten-thousand-dollar contributions don't go unnoticed.
The system creates the perception that money is influencing justice.
