Jeremy Pate Quotations

I think that?s what Kit was driving at. We have so many of these, it might be good for city to determine where they should actually go. That way, it?s not an issue.

The fact that the house was already there was a critical component. It was a residential-looking house. The actual structure on the property that you see every day when you drive by is not going to change.

What that tells us is that when the zoning code was created, the presence of a church was not necessarily incompatible with residential uses, but it does have a use that?s not the same, so there should be measures taken to create a compatible interaction between those two.

The traffic generated would almost double what's on Joyce now. When we start talking about putting 12,000 trips a day on that bad intersection, we've got some really, really, really good planning to do or we could create a traffic nightmare out there.

It?s hard to conceal a 150-foot pole and not make it look ridiculous.

Once it?s in our hands, it?s public and anyone, another carrier, could request where those dead spots are and try to get it (a tower location) before them. They don?t want other competitors knowing that information.

I don?t think there are any coverage concerns. Everything looks to be relatively covered in this area. It?s more about capacity.