Stanton Glantz Quotations

would cut movie smoking's effect on kids in half, saving 50,000 lives a year in the U.S. alone.

There are plenty of people in California government who are running agencies that are larger and more complex than the University of California who are not getting ridiculously astronomical salaries.

There are more studies, the risk estimates are more consistently elevated, and they're higher than they were for lung cancer. Plus, there's all these toxicology studies and molecular biology they didn't have back then.

Secondhand smoke is even worse than we thought. It increases the risk for an acute coronary event like a heart attack or long-term development of atherosclerosis.

I think this is the beginning of the unraveling of several indictments.

It doesn't take much to cause big effects. If you already have compromised coronary circulation and go into a smoky environment, there is a substantial increase in your risk of an acute event.

It is biased too heavily toward the private sector.

This report is forcing reconsideration of this issue by health officials all over the world.

What Phillip Morris is doing here is a tremendous disservice to parents and to infants because it's increasing the risk infants will die.

We found the original draft of the scientific paper, which said, 'secondhand smoke increases the risk of sudden infant death,' in Phillip Morris's corporate files along with their suggestions to Sullivan to change it.

entirely free to publish his review without including our comments and without restriction.

This is a seminal, international document. It's impossible to underestimate what a big deal this is.

It's pretty simple. These laws are very bad for the cigarette companies, because they create an environment for people to quit if they want to.

If people are serious about breast cancer, they have to deal with secondhand smoke. That's what this is all about.