Eric Rothschild Quotations

When you see 'critical analysis of evolution,' you really need to look at what's behind that. Who? Why? Why is there this need for critical analysis of evolution? Why is there no call for critical analysis of plate tectonics?

What we have to share about our experience in the Dover case is informative to anyone involved in the debate.

We're fighting for the 1st Amendment, the separation of church and state, and the integrity of schools. This trial should decide whether a school board can impose its religious views on other students.

This will not be the last case of this nature. I think that future school boards and school districts aware of this decision have to think very carefully about whether they want to put their communities through this.

They did everything you would do if you wanted to incorporate a religious point of view in a science class and cared nothing about its scientific validity.

Future school boards or states that are considering it should be aware of how much it costs to bring a case like this to protect individuals' constitutional rights.

Its essential religious nature does not change whether it is called 'creation science' or 'intelligent design' or 'sudden emergence theory. The shell game has to stop.

Intelligent design became the label for the board's desire to teach creationism.

The intelligent-design movement is an effort to introduce creationism into the schools under a different name.

Board members in starkly religious terms changed the science curriculum to advance a specific religious viewpoint.