Kenneth Saul "Ken" Rogoffis an American economist and chess Grandmaster. He is the Thomas D. Cabot Professor of Public Policy and Professor of Economics at Harvard University... (wikipedia)
There is no doubt that the attack is having a negative effect on activity now in many regions of the globe, and that it has increased what were already significant downside risks to the short-term global outlook.
Global markets have a much bigger effect on prices and wages in the U.S. and elsewhere than they did before.
Oil exporters have a lot of useful ways to spend the money,
this means that 2005 is only going to be a very good year for global growth, rather than the spectacular one it might have been but for oil prices.
It's a wonderful appointment. The whole economics world is cheering about it.
It's a disaster for Europe and a huge problem for future growth.
The problem - at least in the United States - is not that people can't find jobs. The problem is that they're no longer finding jobs that provide them with dignity and decent social status.
The Indians and Chinese have become brilliant chess professionals. They get on a plane and play all over the world. This has led to dramatic pressure on incomes. Nowadays, the best chess player in Argentina can no longer make a living playing chess.
People aren't looking at how they're doing, but rather at how their neighbors are doing and at their own place in society.
Unbridled capitalism in the United States can't be sustained socially. It leads to tensions.
Marx's theory that only capitalists benefit from capitalism and workers are exploited was completely wrong. Nothing could have been further from the truth. Workers earned more as economies grew.
There has been a noticeable decline in the labor factor in all wealthy countries in the past 20 years. The rich are getting richer, but those at the lower end aren't moving ahead as quickly as the capitalists.
The assertion that everyone benefits simultaneously from free trade is simply incorrect.
Unbridled capitalism will lead to some very real problems.
It comes as no surprise that average Americans have a different perception of the economy than (US President) George W. Bush and his friends. They can play around with statistics as much as they want, but it's clear that we have an unfair distribution of wealth.
I tell my children that a man like Bill Gates has a personal fortune of $100 billion. They can't even comprehend that. Then I explain that he has more money than some countries.
It's quite astonishing how much money people make in the hedge fund business and in the private equity field, and how well-off affluent families really are.
Workers are not being exploited. But if their share of growth doesn't increase, this could be a potential cause of social tension worldwide.
I think that a lot of the money - these big bills - is used to facilitate tax evasion and crime.
We all use cash in our everyday life, but we don't use hundred-dollar bills. We're not using 500-euro notes. And yet these account for mountains of cash out there. I think they're being used in tax evasion and by criminals of all types.
... far more people make a living as professional chess players today than ever before. Thanks partly to the availability of computer programs and online matches, there has been a mini-boom in chess interest among young people in many countries.
If you didn't have employers able to pay off the books and off the record safely in cash, you wouldn't have illegal immigration on nearly the scale that we do.
Why are oil prices so low? First, energy consumption growth rates in developing markets have decreased. This is particularly noticeable in China. Second, new technologies are being developed and the shale gas revolution in the USA has taken place
Russia depends on natural resources way too much. Russian economy is not diversified enough
Cash is very easy to hide. It's easy to hoard. It's easy to move, especially these large bills.
It is vital for Russia to normalize relations with the rest of the world. You shouldn't isolate your economy
Russia exists in the context of open global economy and is a part of it
We're not just going to see mid-sized banks go under in the next few months, we're going to see a whopper.
I don't think it's time yet to eliminate cash, but I propose having a less-cash society, not a cashless one.
Worrying about inflation now is like worrying about the measles when you might get the plague.
We Americans are not about to stop borrowing as long as they give us money for nothing.
Today, chess programs have become so good that even grandmasters sometimes struggle to understand the logic behind some of their moves.
The Greenspan era has coincided with a period when the global economy has made the job of a central banker easier.
The fund has the reserves to pay for its operations for the next several years. It is only if the good times go on for another five to seven years and there are no major financial crises, then it is going to become a significant issue.