Go back in any news archive and look at the men who have been freed from prison, look at the men that have been taken off death row. Mistakes happen. Bad directions are taken by district attorneys; police make mistakes. It happens all the time: False accusation is commonplace.
It was negative last week. It's going to be negative next week.
These photos are real. We have them, and we will release them if it's appropriate. As we've said all along, this is a completely atypical way for a case to progress. We have a lot of evidence that wouldn't have come out yet, as does the state -- and we don't even have a case yet.
We were actually hoping that she would pick names that we know were not at the party, and it would appear she did exactly that.
I'm doing the best I can. Does it help the people lobbying for money and resources? Probably. But is that my agenda? No.
They had been there at some point. But we are assembling a paper trail that will show that they weren't there when this woman said the sexual assault took place. The state is going to be surprised.
I believe my client. He says he didn't do anything, and he believes nobody else did anything. No matter how this turns out, it's a terrible thing for somebody.
We've been told there is a video of the identification process, and in my opinion we should have it by now.
I don't believe that the allegations that she made, multiple attacks by multiple people, would leave no signs of DNA. And there was no sign of any evidence that a male was present anywhere near that women that day.
He's an excellent trial attorney. He's truthful. I don't get the impression he's ever taken advantage of a situation. I think he's very fair. He always gives cases thoughtful consideration, and I expect him to do the same with this.
