We're questioning the legality of that. It's hard for us to justify that as a legitimate cost.
As part of the rezoning vote, they accepted that recommendation, which opened the door for our legal challenge, we think. We don't understand how they can now consider that blighted.
They have to find it consistent with the master plan and they have voted that it is not, currently.
The legal remedy is to nullify those votes. The only thing (CATIF) doesn't want is the participation of public money.