There is no pattern of demonstration that justices appointed by the president then try to defend the president's constitutional prerogatives.
Nothing in Al Gonzales? public statements, legislative proposals or anything else suggests that this is an individual who operates outside of the political gyroscope of President Bush.
He will not be blunderbuss and say the president has carte blanche, ... On the other hand, he is not going to ignore national security. He will pay deference, but not blind deference.
Katherine Harris is going to live and die on (President Bush's) coattails. She is not someone who has political legs. She is more tied to the president than the ordinary member of the House.
The burden of persuasion is on the president to establish the program's legality.
It seems to me he is conceding that there are other NSA surveillance programs ongoing that the president hasn't told anyone about.