I don't know that the jury had to like him, they just had to believe that he was right on the facts.
I think the jury is there to be entertained, in part, and to listen to something they can make sense of.
We've been right all along that Ronnie Earle charged a crime that didn't exist and there's 30 years of precedent that backs that up. We want to get to trial and hope once we do, a jury will find Tom Delay didn't do anything illegal.
Without those disclosures or your authority to make inquiry of grand jury members, we cannot go forward on that matter.
That's astonishing, astonishing that they would get a grand jury to indict and allege there is a list and then they have to admit in open court the first time they appear in open court that there is no list.
In my experience I have never seen the type of vituperative responses and opinions expressed by 80 percent of the large jury panel as are present in this case.