Rather than dividing the world between good and evil, the Left divided the world in terms of economics. Economic classes, not moral values, explained human behavior. Therefore, to cite a common example, poverty, not one's moral value system, or lack of it, caused crime.
Conservatives divide the world in terms of good and evil while liberals do it in terms of the rich and poor.
That's a phenomenon of the Left: You don't fight evil. You fight carbon emissions
Just because you cannot fight every evil does not mean you should fight no evils.
There is a very good thing about hating evil. If you hate evil, that's all you will hate
If you really do hate evil, you can't hate anything else
Those of you who love the Lord should hate evil
If the United States doesn't lead then evil triumphs
If there is no God, the labels 'good' and 'evil' are merely opinions. They are substitutes for 'I like it' and 'I don't like it.' They are not objective realities.
There was one thing more than any other that turned this New York, liberal, Jewish, Columbia University graduate student away from modern liberalism: its use of moral equivalence to avoid confronting evil during the Cold War.
Nothing enables people to do evil as much as does a sense of victimhood
Lies and victimhood make evil possible
We conservatives fight evil; the Left fights carbon emissions
There are subtle ways and overt ways of alienating a child from a parent, but either way it's evil
This is the belief of the Left: You negotiate with evil, and get tough with your allies
To understand the Left, one must understand that in its view the greatest evil is material inequality. The Left is more troubled by economic inequality than by evil as humanity has generally understood the term.
Compassion without wisdom is dangerous. It's what enables people to support the 'underdog,' even if the underdog is evil
Most evil comes from the belief that one is a victim, or one's group is a victim
Those who don't hate evil hate those who do
If your religion doesn't teach you the difference between good and evil, your religion is worse than useless.
Although images of perfection in people's personal lives can cause unhappiness, images of perfect societies - utopian images - can cause monstrous evil. In fact, forcefully changing society to conform to societal images was the greatest cause of evil in the twentieth century.
If we continue to teach about tolerance and intolerance instead of good and evil, we will end up with tolerance of evil.
Those who do not confront evil resent those who do.