Well, beyond that, it's settled as a precedent of the court, entitled to respect under principles of stare decisis. And those principles, applied in the Casey case, explain when cases should be revisited and when they should not. And it is settled as a precedent of the court, yes.
It's settled as a precedent of the court, entitled to respect under principles of stare decisis,
That is a precedent entitled to respect under principles of stare decisis like any other precedent of the court.