He was the strongest advocate for change on the NYSE board, ... he probably sets the right example.
We believe he should resign from the board as well. It is not clear to us how a two-year lame duck CEO will benefit shareowners, and his continued presence on the board would prevent the company from the clean break that is needed to restore investor confidence.
Environmental technology promises attractive long-term investment returns while doing something positive on a global scale.
This discontent is too wide and way too deep in the marketplace, and it has led us to believe that Eisner should go and the board should get quickly to work on planning for an orderly transition.
Eisner's resignation as CEO is the right move for shareowners,